January 24 Through February 4—TUCSON, ARIZONA: Annual show
Welcome to the GemologyOnline.com Forum
A non-profit Forum for the exchange of gemological ideas
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:35 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Are synthetic gemstones considered a mineral?
Poll ended at Wed Aug 26, 2020 12:12 am
A. Yes 80%  80%  [ 4 ]
B. NO 20%  20%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 5
Author Message
 Post subject: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:12 am 
Offline
New to the Forum or The Quiet Type

Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 6:56 am
Posts: 7
Let's check out the gems knowledge :?: :?:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 1:52 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 21602
Location: San Francisco
Of course, there are synthetically made minerals.
Quartz is an excellent example.

Some synthetics, like cubic zirconia, YAG, GGG, are artificial products. They do not have naturally occurring counterparts.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 2:34 pm 
Offline
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 2:18 am
Posts: 1542
Yes, the term synthetic doesn't define the material, only its origin. In a mineralogical case it should be used as an adjective. It needs a noun to be used with any precision.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 4:11 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:58 pm
Posts: 1424
Location: San Marcos, CA
It would seem that this poll ended before it began. Would synthetic opal be a mineral?

_________________
The Gem Garden
San Marcos, CA


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 4:54 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 21602
Location: San Francisco
No, I would call it an artificial product.

And natural opal doesn't really qualify as a mineral either.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 5:37 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:58 pm
Posts: 1424
Location: San Marcos, CA
Yes, I guess I was making a further point, in the trade many things are sold under the synthetic umbrella. But as you stated many are imitations and simulants.

_________________
The Gem Garden
San Marcos, CA


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 5:44 pm 
Offline
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 2:18 am
Posts: 1542
glhays wrote:
It would seem that this poll ended before it began. Would synthetic opal be a mineral?



I agree with Barbara. Natural Opal, being amorphous is probably not properly called a mineral but maybe a mineraloid.

"the difference between mineral and mineraloid is that mineral is (geology) any naturally occurring inorganic material that has a (more or less) definite chemical composition and characteristic physical properties while mineraloid is a substance that resembles a mineral but does not exhibit crystallinity."

To settle the original question. The Merriam-Webster dictionary actually has an entry for synthetics as being minerals.

Mineral:

"b: a synthetic substance having the chemical composition and crystalline form and properties of a naturally occurring mineral"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 7:23 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 21602
Location: San Francisco
The caveat is "naturally" occurring.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2020 12:23 pm 
Offline
Established Member

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2018 7:25 am
Posts: 38
No. A mineral is by definition naturally occurring, so a synthetic gem is just that.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2020 2:07 pm 
Offline
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 2:18 am
Posts: 1542
Nick_G wrote:
No. A mineral is by definition naturally occurring, so a synthetic gem is just that.


I agree that the traditional geologic and gemologic definition states "naturally Occurring". GIA still teaches it this way in its latest courseware.

But as you can see below, this is not as clear cut as you and GIA state it to be.

The Merriam-Webster dictionary clearly disagrees with you.

See section 5b below.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mineral


1: ORE
2: an inorganic substance (as in the ash of calcined tissue)
3obsolete : MINE
4: something neither animal nor vegetable
5a: a solid homogeneous crystalline chemical element or compound that results from the inorganic processes of nature
broadly : any of various naturally occurring homogeneous substances (such as stone, coal, salt, sulfur, sand, petroleum, water, or natural gas) obtained usually from the ground
b: a synthetic substance having the chemical composition and crystalline form and properties of a naturally occurring mineral
6minerals plural, British : MINERAL WATER


Last edited by 1bwana1 on Thu Aug 20, 2020 2:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2020 2:09 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 21602
Location: San Francisco
In order for something to be described as synthetic in the gem world there has to be a naturally occurring counterpart.
Synthetic diamond: Natural Diamond
Synthetic Sapphire: Natural Sapphire

Artificial product: cubic zirconia. ZrO2 is doped with a calcium oxide or yttrium to stabilize it and have it xlize in a cubic form.
Baddeleyite is a naturally occurring ZrO2, but it contains no calcium oxide and crystallizes with a prismatic monoclinic habit. Therefore, CZ isn't a synthetic.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2020 2:16 pm 
Offline
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 2:18 am
Posts: 1542
So maybe in order to keep the definition consistent across disciplines, the definition should be updated to something like:

A naturally occurring substance, or synthetically produced equivalent substance....

In any case I think if you use the word mineral alone it implies naturally occurring. You must use the adjective synthetic when referring to a lab made mineral equivalent.

This also plays in the grey area of inorganic when describing minerals vs gemstones. There are a number of organic gemstones. Pearls are an example. However pearls are covered by organically produced layers of aragonite. Is this aragonite a mineral? There is both inorganic and organic origins of the mineral aragonite. Additionally these aragonite layers can form spontaneously in nature, or be cultured by mans intervention. There is quartz that is natural in origin, and quartz that is lab grown in origin.

AS man is more and more capable of inserting itself into the processes of nature, nothing in the World is simple black or white these days it seems.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2020 2:31 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 21602
Location: San Francisco
Synthetic stones described in the CIBJO Blue Book
4.2.3 Synthetic products are those having essentially the same chemical composition, physical properties and structure as that of their naturally occurring counterparts.

That is why lab grown "opal" is an artificial product, an imitation.

The difference is that lab produced "opals" are impregnated with a polymer which fills the voids/space between the monodisperse silica particles, not silica. Hence, properties like specific gravity, refractive index, hardness and temperature resistance are different.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2020 2:54 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:31 pm
Posts: 4015
Location: North Carolina
I think some confusion arises from how geology courses are taught. In geological terms like 'rock' and 'mineral' describe classes of materials rather than individual objects. So you might get corrected by a geologist or enthusiast when you call a mineral specimen a "rock" but that's more a distinction of what class of material it is a good example of.
We all agree that a lab-grown crystal of quartz is still quartz, since all properties are essentially the same. We also agree that quartz (as a class) is a mineral, so you can certainly say that lab-grown piece is an example of a mineral, just as a CZ is not an example of a mineral but rather a "mineralloid" (until we find some in nature), and moissanite was reclassified as a mineral when it was finally found in nature.
One could certainly call it an arbitrary distinction, which is truem. We're just putting things in convenient boxes, and part of that is the fun of arguing about edge cases.
Does that make some "synthetic opals" a mineraloidoid? I'm going to say yes.

_________________
Rough and cut classic and exotic synthetic gems:https://store.turtleshoard.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gemstones Question
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2020 3:09 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 21602
Location: San Francisco
I'll say, "no". I love being arbitrary. :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 4 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Gemology Style ported to phpBB3 by Christian Bullock