With a little research, I found a blog from 2010 written by Callan Bentley who is an assistant professor of geology at Northern Virginia Community College.
Callan wrote:
28 October 2010 The tale of the hammerheaded copper tadpole Okay, now just what the heck is going on in these pictures?
The photos are different views of the same crystal. It is a broken hexagonal prism of quartz, fading to amethyst at the distal end, found by Doug Dupin of northwest DC during the excavation that led to the Palisades Museum of Prehistory. The crystal is about 3.5 cm long, and 1 cm wide. The curiously-shaped inclusions you see in these photos are ~2 mm long.
Last year, Doug and I photographed the crystal using my new Nikon microscope, and Doug put it up on some mineralogy discussion boards, but got no positive ID. The issue came up again last Saturday night, at a homebrew keg-tapping party at Doug’s museum, where I met Doug’s friend Maria Stenzel, a National Geographic photographer. Maria had also taken a photo of the crystal with her macro lens, and has willingly shared it here*: it’s the last of the three images above. It offers a nice contrast to my images — while hers is sharper and you can see more focused “shape” detail, mine more accurately reflect the colors: the quartz is pinkish purple, more so towards the tip, and the inclusions appear “coppery” in luster and tone.
Key observations: the “hammerhead” shapes are distal to the pointed “tail” of these structures, which are more proximal to the core of the crystal prism. The tails all start at the same depth, and the semi-circular hammerheads all occur at the same “shallower” level in the crystal. Some of the inclusions are “double-headed” that merge into a single “tail.” There are also small spherical coppery balls present, apparently made of the same material but with a different shape.
What is the origin of these inclusions? Why are they shaped in this curious way?
Any insights, well-founded or wildly-speculative, would be welcome. Let us know what you think in the comments section below.
You can "count the rings" on some of these. I wonder if each one corresponds to a separate event?
PIC1 is the nail with separate rings. Seems like each ring corresponds to a growth layer. I also have specimens with hematite "disks". Stack a bunch of these "disks" together and you will get a "nail".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum