January 24 Through February 4—TUCSON, ARIZONA: Annual show
Welcome to the GemologyOnline.com Forum
A non-profit Forum for the exchange of gemological ideas
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 5:25 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Simulated Vs Synthetic--Difference
PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:35 pm 
Offline
New to the Forum or The Quiet Type

Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:24 pm
Posts: 2
Know next to nothing about gems. Got to Browsing, came across the "Synthetic Gems" website.

They had both Gems classed as "Simulated"; and those labeled "Synthetic"--but they didn't explain.

Is there a difference?

I mean, in ordinary usage a Man-Made Diamond isn't simulated--it actually IS Crystal Carbon.....

But Cubic Zirconium, or even cut Lead-Glass could be called "Simulated Diamond".....

So the question becomes--Simulated how? How Well? From what Material?

Saxon Violence


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Simulated Vs Synthetic--Difference
PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:47 pm 
Offline
Gemology Online Royal Princess

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 6461
Location: The frozen north prairie :-/
A synthetic gemstone is one that is chemically identical to a natural gemstone, just created in a lab.

A simulated gemstone can be any substance being used to represent another gemstone, i.e., cubic zirconia, a created substance, simulates a diamond, but so too can a natural zircon or natural spinel simulate (pretend to be) a diamond.

How well a product simulates another depends on many factors -

What gemstone is being represented?

Does the color properly represent those found in the natural item?

How close to the RI is the substitute material?

I hope this helps a bit :) .

_________________
IIJA Registered Gemologist
GIA Graduate Gemologist


Last edited by Barbara O. Ellis on Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Simulated Vs Synthetic--Difference
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:46 am 
Offline
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 8:32 am
Posts: 1730
Location: Suwanee, GA US
My favorite example is Alexandrite. There is a corundum simulant, and a synthetic (Alexandrite is a chrysoberyl). That highlights that the corundum is the simulant and helps sort of organize the difference in your head.

_________________
George Ellis
www.faceting.biz


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Simulated Vs Synthetic--Difference
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 11:15 am 
Offline
Valued Contributor

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:20 pm
Posts: 354
Location: Texas
simulant = fake, synthetic = artificial.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Simulated Vs Synthetic--Difference
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:14 pm 
Offline
Valued Contributor

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 5:00 am
Posts: 344
Location: Finland
Quote:
simulant = fake, synthetic = artificial.


Hmm... White zircon can be diamond simulant but no way it's a fake.
Fake comes from misrepresentation.

Synthetic has natural counterpart.
Artificial doesn't have.

_________________
GemmoRaman GemmoFtir GemmoSphere


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Simulated Vs Synthetic--Difference
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:47 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 11:24 am
Posts: 7523
Location: Rome, Italy
mikko wrote:
Quote:
simulant = fake, synthetic = artificial.


Hmm... White zircon can be diamond simulant but no way it's a fake.


yeah, the same for other diamond simulants...... colorless sapph as an example...

Quote:
Fake comes from misrepresentation.

Synthetic has natural counterpart.
Artificial doesn't have.


yup AGREE.....

ciao
albé

_________________
GemmoRaman-532 - GemmoFTIR - GemmoSphere - EXA


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Simulated Vs Synthetic--Difference
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:49 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 21602
Location: San Francisco
http://gemologyonline.com/synthetics.html


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Simulated Vs Synthetic--Difference
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:39 pm 
Offline
Valued Contributor

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:20 pm
Posts: 354
Location: Texas
Artificial refers to man made...fake refers to something represented as something else. White sapphire represented as diamond is a fake diamond. Synthetic diamond is an artificial diamond. Simple.
Everything is real, after all, unless it is imaginary.
Using language that is clearly understood by most people is the goal of good communication.
Using language that confuses most people should be avoided.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Simulated Vs Synthetic--Difference
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:36 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 21602
Location: San Francisco
Although your argument can make sense to both a novice and a pro, you are using terms which are not "gemologically" preferred when describing gems, Richard.

Artificial and fake are words I might use when describing a leatherette chair or Lady Gaga's eyelashes.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Simulated Vs Synthetic--Difference
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:50 pm 
Offline
Gold Member

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 1133
Location: Monterey, CA
SaxonViolence wrote:
But Cubic Zirconium, or even cut Lead-Glass could be called "Simulated Diamond"....

The term is Cubic Zirconia. Zirconium is a metal. Zirconia is an oxide.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Simulated Vs Synthetic--Difference
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 11:08 pm 
Offline
Valued Contributor

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:20 pm
Posts: 354
Location: Texas
I understand. Sometimes the "gemologically" prefered terms seem an obfuscation.
Such as using "saturation" when color-intensity is really ment. Or denying the existence of "pink".
The fact that every beginner has a difficult time with these terms, that have been adopted (or redefined) by gemology, shows the very akwardness of the definitions.
I love gemology; have been at it 31 years. After grad school I expected the GIA (in residence) to be intense...but found the lectures more geared to a 10th grade education (the lab was challenging). The FGA title didn't inspire me more than the GG. Nevertheless, I love the field; mostly because it is one of continuing education.
We are the step-children of minerologists and crystolographers; always attempting to make ourselves "scientists". We use a vocabulary that we have made our own; one which often confuses the general public, as well as those learning the trade.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Simulated Vs Synthetic--Difference
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 1:06 am 
Offline
Valued Contributor

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 5:00 am
Posts: 344
Location: Finland
Richard, of course you are entitled to have your own advanced opinions about terminology after 31 years, but this is beginners only section. Each of the terms mentioned here has distinct universally accepted description in gemology. It's not only matter of 'science' or 'not science' but important for communication between dealers and consumer protection (actually, protection for retailer too).

Let's have a fresh example: Italian law about gemological materials has the terminology included into law. It's not arguable anymore, no matter how many years each has had time to 'rethink' gemology. I like that, it makes the confusing world much simpler.

_________________
GemmoRaman GemmoFtir GemmoSphere


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Simulated Vs Synthetic--Difference
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:55 am 
Offline
Valued Contributor

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:20 pm
Posts: 354
Location: Texas
Mikko, you make a good point. This is a beginner's section.
By all means, everyone must learn the definitions as they are presented in your gemological texts, and use them in your exams.
I am trying only to explain the differences between synthetic and simulant in a way that helps people understand. It works well for customers and co-workers.
Good studying all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Simulated Vs Synthetic--Difference
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 7:55 pm 
Offline
Established Member

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 5:01 pm
Posts: 17
If I did not already know the difference between simulant and synthetic, being new at this, I would be very confused after reading all your comments!!

Simply and non-technically, a synthetic IS what it claims to be, but lab-grown. A simulant can be man-made or natural, but it is not chemically what it is replacing.

Peach


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Gemology Style ported to phpBB3 by Christian Bullock